Python is a dying language!
Saturday, August 25th, 2007Just because I typed it doesn’t mean it is true. I for one am a little annoyed that there are people who say things like, “ColdFusion is a dead language”. I am looking in your direction Mr. Lowe. Ok, I get it…you don’t like that there isn’t a framework to do all the work for you. Ok, I get that you don’t like the fact that you can’t use polymorphic design principles or interfaces and the like. ColdFusion isn’t OO enough for you. We all understand that, just leave the language and enjoy the greener pastures. It makes no sense to bash a language because it doesn’t coddle you enough. Why not switch to .NET, there you can let the IDE do all the main tasks for you and all you have to worry about is how you set up your objects and interfaces and data models.
I always thought it was a little lame to say that a language is dead and that another language is SO much better. Especially when you complain about how the previous language didn’t have a framework that did everything for you. If I don’t like a language, I just stop using it. I don’t go around telling the masses how much it stinks. Truth be told, it probably doesn’t stink. Maybe it doesn’t fit my needs for a given project. Maybe I don’t know it well enough to use it. It could also be true that I don’t want to invest the time to design/develop a framework to “make life easier”.
As a developer, and aspiring pragmatist, I tend to use the language that suits my needs. I don’t go trudging into the dark with one language because it is good for me at the time. That would lead to me proclaiming that the new language is dead when I find something better.
I just hope that Python and the DJango framework, the most ultimate in programming, don’t become dead languages in a few years just because another language is better at the time.
